Now if I run git branch -r I will no longer have an origin/pu: my Git no longer has that as a remote-tracking branch. (Usually, for situations like this, they have only local branches.)įor illustration purposes, let me delete one of my own remote-tracking branches (this is pretty harmless since I will run git fetch in a moment to restore it): $ git branch -r -d origin/puĭeleted remote-tracking branch origin/pu (was 7c79844). They, too, may have local branches, and even remote-tracking branches, of their own. So you can look at your information, or you can ask your Git to call up their Git, over the Internet-phone, and query them about their information. Remember that there are two (or sometimes even more) Git version-control databases involved any time you fetch or push commits. git remote (sometimes) actually calls up the remote Git Means that my Git's origin/master is my Git's memory of what master meant, on origin, the last time had my Git call up origin and fetch-i.e., update-from them. Hence: $ git rev-parse -symbolic-full-name origin/master Note that feeding a remote-tracking branch name to git rev-parse also works, and you can get its symbolic-full-name as well: this simply begins with refs/remotes/, followed by the name of the remote, followed by the local name as seen if you're the Git running on the remote. It is possible for you to manipulate them yourself, but it's not profitable, as their intent is to remember some other Git's branch names (and corresponding SHA-1 values). The key difference between these is that your local branches are your names to manipulate however you like, while your remote-tracking branches are your names that Git automatically slaves to something else. These are what git branch -r shows: $ git branch -r The word "branch" often means one of these: a name that, when fed to git rev-parse, resolves to a commit ID: $ git rev-parse diff-merge-baseĪnd whose full name starts with refs/heads/: $ git rev-parse -symbolic-full-name diff-merge-base These are what git branch shows, when used with no arguments and flags. Let's back up a bit, and define two sets (or classes, or whatever word you like to group them) of branches. Git remote show origin shows me all branches. There are, in fact, three sets of branch names involved in this question. You do, however, have at least one small misconception built in to your question-which is not surprising this particular part of Git is tricky at first. It's not at all clear why you've been seeing remote-tracking branches without these flags (perhaps you have been using a GUI that shows them automatically?). Plus, your Git CLI can run tests to ensure that your changes did not break anything.TL DR: just use git branch -r or git branch -a (after git fetch to update). This ensures that your changes are seen and approved by others. Instead, you can create a pull request, ask another developer to approve it, and merge it to the main branch. However, it is safest never directly push to the main branch. Give yourself the permission to push (if you are not the administrator of the git repository, you will need to ask an administrator to permit you to push to the main branch).Mark the master branch as unprotected (in settings > protected branches). Many git providers mark the master branch as protected, so you will not be able to push to it directly. Here are some of the most common reasons for this error. It is a script configurable by the user that analyses all the incoming commits and decides if they should be let through or not. This error means that the pre-receive hook rejected your commit. The "pre-receive hook declined" error can happen when you push a commit to a remote repository using the git push command. Why the "pre-receive hook declined" error happens?
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |